8 years ago
Article Rating
2
Human Rights during Wars times from an Islamic Perspective
Starting a war is Islam is permissible only for fending off aggressors and lifting victims of persecution to a decent life standards. Islam cherishes and preserves human lives regardless of religious affiliation. According to Islamic teachings, the killing of one person is tantamount to a large scale carnage that puts an end to all human race. Surrah Al-maeda of the Holy Quran verse 32 reads
Wars had never been launched to spread the message of Islam. Those who have embraced Islam had never been coerced to do so. They were convinced of the truthfulness of its message and had full freedom to choose their own course in life. Verse 256 of Surrah Al-baqra reads :
In the after math of Islamic conquests, throughout history people of the land were given freedom to choose embracing Islam or paying protection taxes for the Muslim army. Levying that tax was justifiable as non Muslims were not drafted. The fundamental reasons for going to war is repulsion of acts of aggression. In series of verses 190-194 of Surrah Al-baqarra of the Quran teachings strictly prohibits belligerency towards non combatants.
However the right of self-defense which has only recently been introduced by positive legislators had well been enshrined in is Islamic jurisprudence. War may also be declared in order to lift persecuted people who face wanton aggression. Verse No. 75 of Surah Al-nissa reads
In a speech attributable to the Prophet Mohamed (PUBH), he advised against killing innocent people were reiterated to two army leaders at two different mobilization occasions namely to Ali Ibn Abitalib and Moaaz Ibn Jabal “ Don’t kill people prior to preaching them for Islamic faith. Don’t kill any of them even if they decline your invitation to become Muslims. Don’t engage in fighting unless they start it and you are sure that they have already killed one of you. Should this happen produce them the dead and show self-restraint by insistence on preaching to the right path. Success in converting a person is more rewarding than acquiring wealth as enormous as areas that receives sunlight. This legacy introduced the principles that govern war proclamation prior to restoring to real engagement. It a principle that positive laws credited only in 1907 during the Hague conference. Baron Mitchell de Top mentions in one of his books that
The European world drew useful lessons from Islam which established the distinctions between combatants and civilians. This concept which is now a source of pride in the western world was plagiarized and no more attributable to the Islamic thought. The Prophet of Islam would issue standard orders to all commanders about to set out on military operations
During one of the battles the prophet was angered when he saw the body of a dead woman and clearly advised againts that saying
This indicates the truth in the dubbing of the prophet Mohamed as
Historians also tell us that the first caliph of Islam Abu Bakar Assidiq observed the same tradition while seeing off the first crusades. He also gave his men instructuions :
The same orders were repeated to the commander of the troops heading for the Levant, Abu Bakar Yazeed Ibn Abi Sifyan and added
Likewise the second caliph of Islam Omar Ibn – Alkhatab gave recommendation to the Muslim army
fight in self-defense but don’t start wars as thy lord loveth not the aggressors. Don’t behave cowardly when real engagement occurs, don’t mutilate the dead in spite of your power, don’t commit atrocities when you have the upper hands, don’t slay women, nor elderly men nor newborn babies. Stand in earnest when knigts engage, at times when heartbeat accelartes and when thrust are mounted. Don’t assosciate holy wars with life allurements and then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the supreme achievement. That a summry of the dos and don’ts of the holy war in Islam which clearly establish how compassionate and perfect Islamic teachings are in comparison with positive legislations. It is by no means comparable to recommendations drawn from the international and civil rights law and future expectations of jurists well versed in positive laws. |